|
|
|
The first thing to note as we begin chapter 8 is that the language this chapter was written in was Hebrew whereas the earlier readings were written in Aramaic. The change in language suggests a change in the scene of operation. So far we have followed the history of the major civilizations and the Roman Catholic Church. In chapter 8 we move to the history of the Middle East. The prophecy is given to Daniel 2 years after the one in chapter 7. We will begin with reading verses one to three. Daniel 8:1-3
|
|
1. |
Cassander - |
ruling Macedonia and Greece |
|
2. |
Lysimachus - |
ruling Thrace and Bythinia in Asia Minor |
|
3. |
Seleucus - |
ruling Syria and the East as far as Babylon |
|
4. |
Ptolemy - |
ruling Egypt, and for a time Palestine and Arabia |
Note here in verse 22 it says, "in his place, but not his power". This is saying that the new ones to stand up would not be of the same blood line as Alexander.
The 'their kingdom' in verse 23 is referring to the kingdoms of the four generals and we are told that from these four kingdoms there would come forth this 'little horn' which would 'wax exceeding great towards the South, toward the East and toward the pleasant land'. This 'little horn' described in verses 23 - 25 as the 'king of fierce countenance, did find fulfilment in the rise of Antiochus Epiphanes, the tyrant Seleucid king who persecuted the remnant of Judah in Palestine in the days of the Maccabees. However, in verse 17 of the chapter, Daniel is clearly told 'Understand, son of man, the vision refers to the time of the end'.
This verse would imply that whilst the evil rule of Antiochus Epiphanes was a fulfilment of the prophecy, we can expect a greater fulfilment during the 'time of the end' or Christian era. Although generally, the concept of seeking to fit several fulfilments into one prophecy can be dangerous, such great exponents of the National Historicist school of prophetic interpretation as Augusta Cooke and A.J. Ferris, believed that in this case, and again in relation to the Kings of the North and South in Daniel 11, there were two fulfilments - a lesser in the days of the warring kingdoms of the Seleucids and Ptolemies, and a greater fulfilment in the Christian era. Concerning the prophecy of the 'little horn' or 'king of fierce countenance' in Daniel 8, Augusta Cooke stated :-
"This little horn has two fulfilments an earlier and later one. The earlier one dealt with Palestine, about 170 years before Christ. The later fulfilment concerns not a person, but a great system spread over many centuries".
By this she meant Islam whose historical fulfilment would come to pass in the same Eastern area where Antiochus Epiphanes had operated, for she also wrote that 'Antiochus Epiphanes was a symbol and prophecy of a great system that was to come'. Bearing all of this in mind, let us look at the detail:-
The Bible is always very clear when it states the direction in which a nation or system spreads forth. This is just as true with Islam, the Eastern Little Horn arising in Arabia within the territory once held by the old Grecian Empire, the warlike religion began to spread outwards from its headquarters at Mecca after the death of Mohammed in 632 A.D. Islam went South first of all, conquering the whole of the Arabic Peninsula under the Caliph Abu Bakir. Then it turned towards the east, just as Daniel had predicted conquering Mesopotamia (modern Iraq) and Persia. Then in 634 A.D. for no apparent reason, the host of Islam instead of continuing eastwards, turned back, first into Syria and then into Palestine 'the pleasant land' of Daniel's prophecy, capturing Jerusalem 637 A.D.
The host of heaven referred to is the professing Christian Church, whilst the stars refer to the ruling powers and authorities within Eastern Christendom, so the Byzantine Empire. Professing and apostate Christendom was indeed opposed, cast to the ground and stamped upon by the followers of Islam, just as Daniel had foreseen. Between 634 and 644 A.D., the Caliph Omar was responsible for the destruction of some four thousand places of Christian worship, trade, commerce, dress and travel. As for the 'stars', the Princes and rulers of Eastern Christendom collapsed like a house of cards before the advance of the warriors of Islam:-
The Prince of the Host and Prince of Princes refer to one and the same person, our Lord Jesus Christ, ruler of Heaven and Earth, King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Whilst there can be no doubt that Mohammed and his Islamic faith were a judgement upon the apostate Christian Church, like so many others used in the hand of God, Mohammed and his followers, filled with pride and guided by evil spirit forces, went beyond attaching the idols and false doctrines of Christendom, to attack the Lord Jesus himself. Whilst admitting in the Koran that Jesus was a prophet of God, they deny His Deity, that He was God manifest in flesh They deny His Atonement and by their declaration "There is one God and Mohammed is His prophet", they place Mohammed second only to God and thus dethrone the Lord Jesus. Furthermore, they give to Mohammed the title of Paraclete or Comforter, the Biblical designation for the Holy Spirit. Thus as Popery the 'little horn of the West' blasphemes the God of Heaven, so also does its counterpart Islam, the 'little horn of the East'.
This conversation between two holy ones is between two angels. The second angel is called in the original text 'palmony' which is 'the Wonderful Numberer'. He tells Daniel how long it's all going to go on for - 2300 years. Literally Antiochus trod down the Temple for 2300 days.
|
171 B.C. |
Antiochus down trod the Temple |
|
+2300 days |
|
|
164 B.C. |
Judas Maccabees liberated and cleansed the Temple site. |
|
|
|
|
334 B.C. |
The rise of Alexander the Great when he invaded Asia |
|
+2300 years |
|
|
1967 A.D. |
The Six-Day War. The old city of Jerusalem, and the site of the Temple or Sanctuary passed out of Muslim control. |
|
|
|
|
457 B.C. |
The edict went forth to restore and rebuild the Temple at Jerusalem |
|
+2300 years |
|
|
1844 A.D. |
The Muslims had to tolerate Christian worship and also the beginning of the Second Advent movement in the U.S. |
Daniel still doesn't understand. The vision was so heavy that he fell on his face and had to be raised up again. Daniel is perplexed and tormented by it all. The angel says, "it is the time of the end".
This refers not merely to Mohammed, but to the entire dynasty of Caliphs and Islamic rulers who succeeded him down the centuries. The fierceness referred to indicates the cruel and essentially warlike nature of Islam as a creed. Mohammed believed in advancing his new religion by means of warfare and conquest, and the historian Gibbon tells us that Mohammed himself 'fought in person at nine battles or sieges, and fifty enterprises of war were achieved in ten years by him or his lieutenants'. As I pointed out earlier, devout Moslems who die fighting for their faith believe that they will go directly to Paradise. It was this fierce spirit which enabled Islam to sweep across North Africa and the East, establishing an Empire, stretching from Spain to India within a century of a Mohammed's death. Truly this 'King of fierce Countenance' became a terror to Christendom and to all who stood in the path of Islam's road to conquest. Always the same offer was given. "The Koran, the Tribute or the Sword".
This phase is rendered 'sinister schemes' here but I feel it is the darkness of the sentences that is all important. This takes us right back to the cave in the deserts of Arabia where Mohammed was visited by the evil spirit Apollyon (Revelation 9:11), who claimed to be the Angel Gabriel and who apparently dictated to Mohammed the 'dark sentences' which were to become the Islamic holy book, the Koran .
Verse 22 and 24 will be looked at together next.
This phrase 'not by (with) his own power' was used earlier in Daniel 8 to show that the rulers of the four kingdoms arising from the Empire of Alexander the Great would not be his own flesh and blood descendants. The expression has the same meaning here, and once again was an extremely accurate prophecy. Although Islam did indeed become mighty, extending at times into Spain and to the very gates of Vienna, as well as eastwards into India, the Caliphs were not the literal flesh and blood descendants of Mohammed, founder of the faith.
Speaking of Islam, the historian Gibbon once again states:- "The use of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice were often subservient to the propagation of the faith".
Just as with Romanism, the Western 'little horn' believed that it was not necessary to keep oaths, treaties and promises to heretics, so Islam, the Eastern 'little horn' held a similar view to agreements made with those it regarded as infidels. On the point of destroying many by 'peace', it is interesting to note that the word 'Islam' is an Arab word meaning 'submission', and is derived from 'salama' - to be free, The followers of Islam always offered peace to the vanquished in return for conversation or tribute, or pain of death. In the meaning of Islam, 'to be free is peace', we might therefore not be far wrong in paraphrasing this section of Daniel's prophecy to read:- "By Islam many shall be destroyed".
The prophecy of Daniel 8 with regard to the downfall of Islam states that it shall not be 'broken without means', or as another translation renders it 'but by no human hand shall he be broken'. How true this prophecy is of the empires and Kingdoms of Islam, for both the Arab or Saracen Empire and the Turkish Ottoman Empire collapsed, not so much as the result of conquest and overthrow by rival military power, but as a result of internal corruption, dissension, collapse and decay. Quarrels over the Caliphate resulting in the rival Umayyaid ( - i - ad) and Abbasid dynasties, together with the splitting of Islam into Sunni and Shi'ite sections resulted in the collapse of the Arab or Saracen Empire (the First Woe of the Revelation Vision). Similarly, fragmentation of the Ottoman Empire, decay and stagnation within, coupled with internal corruption and political dissent as evidenced by the Young Turk movement of the early Twentieth Century, led to its downfall in ruin.
One remaining phrase of the Daniel 8 prophecy requires further explanation, as it has caused much confusion in the past, it is the phrase 'by him the daily sacrifice was taken away and the place of his sanctuary was cast down'.
This prophecy, rather like that of Daniel's 70th Week, can be misunderstood if we fail to see the gender of the words used. The 'he' who magnified himself to (or against) the Prince of the Host, is feminine in gender and refers to the 'little horn' or 'Islam', but the 'he' who took away the daily sacrifice and cast down the sanctuary, is masculine in gender, and also refers, not to Islam, but to the Lord Jesus, the Prince of the Host, who by His once for all atoning Sacrifice on Calvary had made the daily animal sacrifices of the Jews, worthless rituals in the eyes of God, and had cast down their Sanctuary or Temple when he permitted it to be destroyed by the Romans under Titus in 70 A.D. Thus we could well read this phrase as "he (Islam) magnified himself even to (against) the Prince of the Host (the Lord Jesus) by whom (at Calvary), the daily sacrifice was taken away (ceased to be of value or acceptable to God)".
In the U.K. the Islamic Community predict that by 2050 all of England will be Muslim. The Bible says that Islam is one of the three main forces that will gather together the nations of the world for the end time battle.
It wasn't until around 1917 that people began to understand the prophecies of the book of Daniel and the book of Revelation. This period was the first time in recent history that numbers and dates had been taken from the prophecies of the Bible and calculated to show a specific time of fulfilment - that time being 1917. This is why so many Bible students refer to the 1917 fulfilment when Jerusalem was released from Gentile domination.
Daniel was overwhelmed by what he saw. It was a burden for him. We too should have a burden because WITH THE UNDERSTANDING OF PROPHECY COMES THE RESPONSIBILITY to lift up our voices in warning to Israel.
Just as Daniel had to be about the king's business so we too must take the message, shake the heaviness of the burden and go about the Kings business, that is, the King of King's. Tell the King's household. Never has there been a greater need to go out and proclaim the message of the Kingdom.
BE ABOUT THE KING'S BUSINESS - wherever He has set you.
|
•
|